Newsletter on bioeconomic and social research on
Sustainability and Economics in Agriculture


Issue 4, June 1999

Editor: Dave Pannell, University of Western Australia, email David.Pannell@uwa.edu.au
SEA Project main funder: Grains Research and Development Corporation
Address of the SEA News web site:
http://www1.crcsalinity.com.au/newsletter/sea/

In This Issue

Editorial

In Brief
New AARES web page/forthcoming conference. Salinity projects at UWA. New salinity farm-management game. Environmental economics symposium.

Articles:
Economics of Research to Enhance Monitoring of Soil Acidity
A Review of Regional Economic Studies of Dryland Salinity

Policy Forum:
Perceptions of Alternative Salinity Policies by Agency Staff

Ideas and Lessons on Sustainability from Overseas:
Making Use of Salt Affected Lands of Irrigated Farms in Pakistan

Research Methodology
Sensitivity analysis.

Regular Bits and Pieces
News and Coming Events - Overview of the SEA Project - People in the SEA Team - Publications available

Editorial

Many of the items in this issue of SEA News deal with dryland salinity. This problem has had a very high profile in Australia recently, with front page stories on The West Australian newspaper, work continuing on revisions to the Salinity Action Plan in Western Australia, and a recent report released by the Prime Minister's Science, Engineering and Innovation Council on "Dryland Salinity and its Impact on Rural Industries and the Landscape". This report provides a good general background and preceeds a public statement by the Prime Minister, planned for November 1999. To obtain a copy, contact Margaret.Frisch@isr.gov.au.

We welcome three new members to the SEA team. Sally Marsh has joined us at the University of Western Australia on a full time basis, replacing Nicole Glenn. Martin van Bueren is spending most of this year working with us at UWA on a project called "Salt Scenarios 2020". Michael O'Connell is working with Andrew Bathgate at Agriculture Western Australia on soil acidity and salinity. Both Martin and Michael have articles in this issue.

For newcomers, SEA News is a newsletter canvassing issues related to sustainability and economics in agriculture. Our focus is on bioeconomic and social research results and their implications. Much of the research is from the SEA project, funded by Grains Research and Development Corporation. The main way to access SEA News is through email and the web site, but you can also elect to receive a hard copy of the newsletter by snail mail if you prefer.

In Brief

New AARES Web Page. The Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society has a new web page at http://come.to/aares. We remind those of you planning to come to the AARES 2000 conference in January in Sydney that the closing date for paper titles this year is June 30. Younger economists in WA who have not presented at the AARES conference before and who would like to win their air fare to Sydney, contact WA secretary, Liz Petersen (epeterse@agric.uwa.edu.au) for details. You need to submit a paper title in order to enter this contest.

Salinity Projects at UWA. We recently did an inventory of all salinity-related research being conducted in the Agricultural and Resource Economics group at the University of WA. The result was a surprisingly long and diverse list, which we include here: http://www.general.uwa.edu.au/u/dpannell/saltprojects.htm (31K)

New Salinity Farm Management Game. We have developed a version of the successful "Risky Business" farm management game, incorporating an increasing dryland salinity problem. Workshops based around the game are currently being run with extension agents and researchers in rural Western Australia to help them better appreciate salinity from the farmer's perspective. See http://www.general.uwa.edu.au/u/dpannell/risksaltbus.htm (4K)

Environmental Economics Symposium. A very successful symposium was conducted at the University of Western Australian in May, under the title of Using Economics to Value and Preserve the Environment. Copies of overheads presented at the half-day symposium can be purchased from Jan Taylor, Agricultural and Resource Economics, UWA, Nedlands WA 6907, email: jtaylor@cyllene.uwa.edu.au.

Articles

Economics of Research to Enhance Monitoring of Soil Acidity by Michael O’Connell, Andrew Bathgate and Nicole Glenn

"the value of currently available information (from past research) aimed at improving management of soil acidity is high"

Of the many sustainability indicators that have been proposed for agricultural systems, monitoring of subsoil pH and Al appear to be among the more practical for farm management. This study estimates the economic benefits of past and present acidity research designed to enhance the value of monitoring acidity, by allowing better decision making based on the monitoring results. The results indicated that the value of currently available information (from past research) aimed at improving management of soil acidity is high. However, the value of additional information generated by current research aimed at improving the certainty regarding yield response is lower. While moderately high in the low rainfall zone, the information is of less value to farmers in the medium and high rainfall zones. This may have implications for the future focus of acidity research and for defining a set of indicators for monitoring sustainability.
For the full article, see this web page:
http://www.general.uwa.edu.au/u/dpannell/dpap9906f.htm (120K)

A Review of Regional Economic Studies of Dryland Salinity by Martin van Bueren and Dave Pannell

"There appears to be an undue emphasis on assessing the costs of salinity."

There is a large and growing body of literature that deals with the economics of dryland salinity. This review confines its scope principally to economic studies that have dealt with salinity at a regional level. On examining the existing literature, we conclude that (a) There appears to be an undue emphasis on assessing the costs of salinity. More work needs to focus on estimating benefits and costs at the margin for different scales of remedial action. (b) Very few studies extend their analysis of salinity policies to include multiple stakeholders. Further research is required to develop frameworks for assessing the full range of benefits and costs in an integrated fashion. (c) Too many researchers fail to explicitly identify the benchmark against which they are comparing alternative "salinity scenarios". This leads to confusion among non-experts and decision makers because different benchmarks lead to distinctly different questions and, hence, cost (and/or) benefit estimates. (d) GIS technology appears to be a promising tool for assisting with the economic evaluation of salinity policies. However, it requires a great deal of spatial information about land use and capability.
For the full article, see this web page:
http://www.general.uwa.edu.au/u/dpannell/dpap9905f.htm (87K)

Policy Forum

We welcome reactions to articles in SEA News, or on topical relevant issues.

Perceptions of Alternative Salinity Policies by Agency Staff by Laura McCann

"A requirement for 30% tree cover on affected areas was seen as being effective but unfair and costly to farmers."

Economics has looked at the decision process of politicians but the decision process of agency staff has primarily been examined by sociologists. Agencies affect the final form of regulations, they may enforce or ignore regulations that exist, and they provide information to the political process. Policies recommended by economists for non-point source pollution control are seldom implemented by agencies. In order for economists to design policies that are both economically efficient and implementable, we need to better understand the decision-making process of agency staff. This study examined the relation between preferences for a particular policy and the perceived farmer cost, farmer resistance, efficacy in salinity reduction, and administrative costs. The latter were included to find whether costs of implementing policies, such as design of regulations, monitoring of compliance, etc., affect the desirability of policies from the agency's point of view. A survey of agency personnel working on the salinity issue in Western Australia was conducted. Surprisingly, perceptions of farmer cost and perceptions of farmer resistance were not highly correlated. The specific policies that were highly rated on a variety of criteria were subsidies or tax breaks for farmers who plant trees in affected areas. Funding research on areas such as new perennials and productive uses for saline land were also highly rated in several areas. A requirement for 30% tree cover on affected areas was seen as being effective but unfair and costly to farmers. The administrative costs of that policy were also expected to be high. This type of survey can be a useful screening tool to decide which policies to examine in more depth.
For the full article, see this web page: http://www.general.uwa.edu.au/u/dpannell/forum4.htm (101K)

Ideas and Lessons on Sustainability from Overseas

To help us think laterally about the problems we face in Australia, we include an example from overseas in each issue of SEA News. This article is from Amir Abadi, Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Western Australia.

Making Use of Salt Affected Lands of Irrigated Farms in Pakistan by Amir Abadi

"Salinity in Punjab and the North West Frontier Province causes an annual economic loss of about US$300 million"

In Pakistan, about 15 million acres of land are salt affected. Out of this, close to 7 million acres are in the irrigated areas. Severe salinity and waterlogging have resulted in abandonment of about 5 million acres of this area. It has been calculated that salinity in Punjab and the North West Frontier Province causes an annual economic loss of 4.3 billion rupees (about US$300 million). The objectives of this study was to carry out a comparative economic analysis of the role of eucalyptus trees, saltbush and crops on salt affected soils in irrigated farming systems of Pakistan. Key conclusions include the following. (1). Saltbush is the most economical option where soil and water salinity is high and soil texture is porous. However the viability of saltbush depends on its nutritional value for livestock in a cut and carry system. (2). In the irrigated farming systems of Punjab and NWFP, water is more scarce than land. Where non-saline irrigation water is available cropping is a more economical option on the salt affected land than trees or saltbush unless the soil is highly saline.(3). Eucalyptus trees are more economical than saltbush or cropping where soil and irrigation water are both only slightly to moderately saline, especially if the soil has a dense structure with a water table close to the surface. (4). Lack of credit and farmers' preferences for immediate income is more likely to adversely affect adoption of trees than adoption of saltbush.
For the full article, see this web page:
http://www.general.uwa.edu.au/u/dpannell/seaos4.htm (104K)

Research Methodology

Sensitivity Analysis of Economic Models by Dave Pannell

"Even the simplest approaches to sensitivity analysis can be theoretically respectable."

The parameter values and assumptions of any economic model are subject to change and error. Sensitivity analysis broadly defined, is the investigation of these potential changes and errors and their impacts on conclusions to be drawn from the model. Many different approaches to SA are described, varying in the experimental design used and in the way results are processed.
For the full article, see this web page:
http://www.general.uwa.edu.au/u/dpannell/dpap971f.htm (100K)

Regular Bits and Pieces

Overview of the SEA Project

This project has a strong integrative focus, bringing together several sustainability issues and considering their biological, physical and economic implications at the whole-farm level. The main issues being researched in the project are soil salinisation, soil acidification, management of herbicide-resistant weeds, farmer adoption of sustainable practices and the economics of monitoring sustainability indicators. Main funding: Grains Research & Development Corporation. Commencement: 01-Aug-97 Completion: 30-Jun-02

People in the SEA Team

Direct collaborators - Economists: Martin Chopping (Department of Environmental Protection), Gavin White (Campbell White and Associates), Simone Blennerhassett (Agriculture Western Australia), Amir Abadi, Anne Bennett (University of Western Australia), Vanessa Stewart (Agriculture Western Australia). Bio-physical scientists: Don McFarlane, Bill Porter, Chris Gazey, David Bowran, Dan Carter and Rob Hetherington (Agriculture Western Australia), Steve Powles + WAHRI team, David Jasper (University of Western Australia), Norm Campbell, Tom Hatton + team (CSIRO).

Publications available

As well as the articles summarised in this Newsletter, the SEA Project has a range of publications which we invite you to read. A list is shown at the following web page address. You can view and print most of the papers directly in your browser.
Web page: http://www.general.uwa.edu.au/u/dpannell/seapprs.htm

We also have a page with papers that focus on agricultural extension, and adoption and diffusion of innovations in agriculture: Web page: http://www.general.uwa.edu.au/u/dpannell/adoppprs.htm

Other issues of SEA News

Issue #1, May 1998
Issue #2, September 1998
Issue #3, February 1999
Issue #4, June 1999
Issue #5, November 1999
Issue #6, April 2000
Issue #7, July 2000
Issue #8, December 2000
Issue #9, June 2001
Issue #10, September 2001
Issue #11, December 2001
Issue #12, September 2002
Issue #13, September 2002
Index

Copyright note: Some articles in SEA news have subsequently been submitted for publication in journals or books. SEA News contains pre-publication versions of these articles. They have not been subject to peer review, and copyright rests with the authors. When an article is formally published, the version on the SEA News web site is not updated to the published version, as this would violate copyright. However, the citation shown on the web page is updated to allow readers to identify the published version. Readers are encouraged to make use of the material present on the web site, provided that its source is acknowledged. Readers who wish to make direct quotes from an article in SEA News should not attribute the quote to a more formal (e.g. journal) published version of the paper without checking the published version, since the quote may have been alterred or even omitted from the published version.

If you have any comments about SEA News or wish to make additions or deletions to our mailing list, contact David.Pannell@uwa.edu.au


The SEA Project acknowledges support from

Grains Research and
Development Corporation

Copyright © David J. Pannell, 1999
Last revised: June 10, 2004.