Newsletter on bioeconomic and social research on
Sustainability and Economics in Agriculture


Issue 9, June 2001

Editor: Dave Pannell, University of Western Australia, email David.Pannell@uwa.edu.au
SEA Project main funder: Grains Research and Development Corporation
Address of the SEA News web site:
http://www1.crcsalinity.com.au/newsletter/sea/

In This Issue

Editorial
E-letters

In Brief
New Cooperative Research Centre for salinity - Salinity policy task force in Western Australia - OECD report on environmental impacts of agriculture

Articles
A multi-species model for Integrated weed management
The economics of desalination
Commercial tree crops to achieve greenhouse gas neutrality
Oil mallee must look to multi-product industries

Policy Forum
Dryland salinity: Inevitable, inequitable, intractable?

Regular Bits and Pieces
News and coming events - Overview of the SEA Project - People in the SEA team - Publications available

Editorial

It has been a very eventful time for the SEA project since the last issue of SEA news. I've been involved in an intensive round of presentations and meetings about salinity around the country, focussing on the need for a different approach to salinity policy. The arguments have generally been well received. I have been particularly encouraged by the positive responses of many farmers.

The Policy Forum article from the last issue, "Salinity policy: a tale of of fallacies, misconceptions and hidden assumptions", continues to have a life of its own. It has been printed in full or in summary in a diverse range of publications, including The Bulletin, Agricultural Science, Groundcover, Landline, and Agribusiness Decision, and it continues to generate emails a plenty.

In January, the creation of a new Cooperative Research Centre for Plant-Based Management of Dryland Salinity was announced. I will lead one of the five programs of the CRC, the Economic and Social Assessment Program. The SEA Project will be closely aligned with the CRC, and it may be that SEA News evolves into an outlet for the CRC. See "In Brief" for more.

David Pannell, June 2001

E-letters

Thanks for writing the paper "Salinity Policy: A Tale of Fallacies, Misconceptions and Hidden Assumptions." As a revegetation worker of many years I think it is spot on and I hope that it can be promoted and used to influence policy. Keep up the good work.
Greg Dalton, SA

I have just read your article on salinity policy. I have an article in the June Australian Farm Journal on the native vegetation conservation situation in NSW which contains many of the same messages. The NSW Government has set up a number of committees (vegetation, water, catchment management) who have the difficult (impossible?) task of developing resource plans and targets. They readily admit they may have to pluck targets out of the air because the scientific and economic tools/frameworks to do otherwise do not exist for many of the issues they need to investigate. Consultation cannot substitute for good analysis and research. As you say in your article, farmers are becoming jaded with the poor outcomes of consultation alone (as are rural communities with consultation being used as the primary solution to regional economic development). The desire to be seen to be doing something is winning the day and I fear a lot of money is wasted.
David Thompson, CARE Pty Ltd

In Brief

New Cooperative Research Centre for Plant-Based Management of Dryland Salinity. This new Cooperative Research Centre has the aim of developing new plant types and new farming systems which are profitable to farmers, and provide additional benefits from salinity prevention or make use of salinised land. It has five programs of work, including a program for "Economic and Social Assessment": www.crcsalinity.com 

Salinity Task Force. The Western Australian State Government has created a "Salinity Task Force" to review the government's salinity strategy and "to provide a more targeted and cohesive response to Western Australia's salinity threat". David Pannell from the SEA Project is a member of the task force. For background, terms of reference, and information on how to make a submission, see http://www.ministers.wa.gov.au/edwards/Features/salinity.htm Notice: The articles in this issue of SEA News were completed before the commencement of the task force. In articles authored or co-authored by David Pannell, any views expressed in relation to salinity policy represent his personal views and not those of the task force.

New OECD report on environmental impacts of agriculture. Many OECD countries (including Australia) have introduced agri-environmental measures to help improve environmental performance. Nevertheless, this report concludes that levels of environmental damage caused by farming remain high. A free version of the Executive Summary of the Report and further information on the OECD agri-environmental indicators work is available at: http://www.oecd.org/agr/env/indicators.htm

Articles

Marta Monjardino A multi-species bio-economic model for integrated weed management by Marta Monjardino, Dave Pannell and Stephen Powles

"Weed populations in crops generally include several weed species."

A multi-species version of the bio-economic model Resistance and Integrated Management (RIM) has been developed to deal with the complexities involved in the long-term integrated management of Lolium rigidum Gaud. (rigid ryegrass) and Raphanus raphanistrum L.(wild radish), which dominate and co-exist in southern Australia. In this paper, we present a review of the existing options on how to model multi-species competition in order to select the best approach for incorporation in the RIM framework. Furthermore, we show how we have extended the original single-species Ryegrass RIM model to include other aspects of R. raphanistrum biology as well as a set of extra weed management practices used to control this weed species. The Multi-species RIM model can be used to evaluate weed management scenarios of co-existing herbicide resistant species.
For the full article, see this web page:
http://www.general.uwa.edu.au/u/dpannell/dpap0105.htm (185K)

The economics of desalination and its potential application in Australia by Tennille Winter, Dave Pannell and Laura McCann
"Prices charged for traditional water supplies generally remain cheaper than the full cost of desalinating water. However, there are ways that the gap might be closed."

It appears that, in Australia, based on current prices charged for water, desalination is currently only competitive with traditional water sources in remote locations. There are two ways that this might change. There may be a continuation of advances in technology for desalination to make better use of solar energy and/or to improve the efficiency of current desalination systems. Alternatively, the true cost of traditional fresh water sources may rise. Even if the former does not occur, the latter appears certain, due to: losses of some traditional sources (due to salinisation), the high cost of preventing salinisation of other traditional sources, and an increasing demand for fresh water as population continues to grow. Desalination appears to be an option deserving serious analysis and investigation.
For the full article, see this web page:
http://www.general.uwa.edu.au/u/dpannell/dpap0102.htm (32K)

Commercial tree crops to achieve greenhouse gas neutrality in south-western Australia by Liz Petersen, Steven Schilizzi and David Bennett

"
A Kyoto Protocol that does not allow for accreditation of commercial plantations as carbon sinks imposes heavy costs on the economies of some ratifying countries."

In the presence of greenhouse gas emission restrictions, the accreditation of tree crops can allow predominantly grazing systems of south-western Australia to remain profitable where the farms would otherwise fail. We argue that a Protocol that encourages tree planting is more likely to be successful, has other benefits such as salinity abatement, and is more likely to encourage greater innovation of green technologies than one that disallows such accreditation.
For the full article, see this web page:
http://www.general.uwa.edu.au/u/dpannell/dpap0103.htm (134K)

Oil mallee must look to multi-product industries by Don Cooper, John Bartle, Steven Schilizzi and Dave Pannell

"Only the integrated mallee processing plant will be able to produce oil at the price required to enter the industrial solvent market."

Oil mallees, various species of eucalypt chosen for high leaf cineole concentration and coppicing habit, are being developed in Western Australia as a potential woody perennial crop in the lower rainfall agricultural regions. A 1999 feasibility study of integrated mallee processing (the concurrent production of eucalyptus oil, electricity and activated carbon from mallee feedstocks) showed that it could be commercially viable. This article reports on further analysis to determine whether integrated mallee processing plants could produce eucalyptus oil at a price suitable for the industrial solvent market. We conclude that it could. We also find that a single-product industry based only on oil-prodection would probably not be viable given projected market prices for the oil.
For the full article, see this web page:
http://www.general.uwa.edu.au/u/dpannell/dpap0104.htm (64K)

Policy Forum

Dryland salinity: inevitable, inequitable, intractable? by Dave Pannell

"Direct public investments in salinity prevention need to be carefully targeted and site-specific, rather than distributed broadly across rural areas "

This paper was presented at the AARES 2001 conference in Adelaide in January 2001. It provides an overview of key issues affecting policies for dryland salinity. It covers aspects of hydrogeology, farmer perceptions and preferences regarding salinity, farm-level economics of salinity management practices, spill-over benefits and costs from salinity management, and salinity politics. The aim is to identify policy directions which will provide the best combination of technical effectiveness and cost effectiveness. The technical challenge of preventing salinity is far greater than previously recognised. The farm-level economics of currently available management practices for salinity prevention are adverse in many situations. Off-site benefits from on-farm practices are often small and long-delayed. Past national salinity policies have been seriously flawed. While current policy proposals include positive elements, they have not sufficiently escaped from the past.
For the full article, see this web page:
http://www.general.uwa.edu.au/u/dpannell/dpap0101.htm (128K)

Regular Bits and Pieces

News and Coming Events

Overview of the SEA Project

This project has a strong integrative focus, bringing together several sustainability issues and considering their biological, physical and economic implications at the whole-farm level. The main issues being researched in the project are soil salinisation, soil acidification, management of herbicide-resistant weeds, farmer adoption of sustainable practices and the economics of monitoring sustainability indicators. Main funding: Grains Research & Development Corporation. Commencement: 01-Aug-97 Completion: 30-Jun-02

People in the SEA Team

Publications available

As well as the articles summarised in this Newsletter, the SEA Project has a range of publications available. A list is shown at the following web page address. You can view and print most of the papers directly in your browser.
Web page: http://www.general.uwa.edu.au/u/dpannell/seapprs.htm

Papers that focus on agricultural extension, and adoption and diffusion of innovations in agriculture:
Web page:
http://www.general.uwa.edu.au/u/dpannell/adoppprs.htm

Papers that focus on dryland salinity:
Web page:
http://www.general.uwa.edu.au/u/dpannell/saltpprs.htm

Other issues of SEA News

Issue #1, May 1998
Issue #2, September 1998
Issue #3, February 1999
Issue #4, June 1999
Issue #5, November 1999
Issue #6, April 2000
Issue #7, July 2000
Issue #8, December 2000
Issue #9, June 2001
Issue #10, September 2001
Issue #11, December 2001
Issue #12, September 2002
Issue #13, September 2002
Index

 

Copyright note: Some articles in SEA news have subsequently been submitted for publication in journals or books. SEA News contains pre-publication versions of these articles. They have not been subject to peer review, and copyright rests with the authors. When an article is formally published, the version on the SEA News web site is not updated to the published version, as this would violate copyright. However, the citation shown on the web page is updated to allow readers to identify the published version. Readers are encouraged to make use of the material present on the web site, provided that its source is acknowledged. Readers who wish to make direct quotes from an article in SEA News should not attribute the quote to a more formal (e.g. journal) published version of the paper without checking the published version, since the quote may have been alterred or even omitted from the published version.

If you have any comments about SEA News or wish to make additions to or deletions from our mailing list, contact David.Pannell@uwa.edu.au


The SEA Project acknowledges support from

Grains Research and
Development Corporation

Copyright © David J. Pannell, 2000
Last revised: June 10, 2004.